# Error updating on Alma 9

**URL:** <https://forum.suricata.io/t/error-updating-on-alma-9/5684>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [May 13, 2025, 6:13pm UTC](https://forum.suricata.io/t/error-updating-on-alma-9/5684 "2025-05-13T18:13:04Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Luca\_vb](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex030/user_avatar/forum.suricata.io/luca_vb/32/3578_2.png) [@Luca\_vb](https://forum.suricata.io/u/Luca_vb)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2025, 6:13pm UTC](https://forum.suricata.io/t/error-updating-on-alma-9/5684/1 "2025-05-13T18:13:04Z")

</div>

Hello,

Dnf update gives me these errors, would appreciate some guidance on how to fix:

> Error:  
> Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package suricata-1:7.0.10-1.el9.x86\_64

- nothing provides librte\_eal.so.25()(64bit) needed by suricata-1:7.0.10-2.el9.x86\_64 from copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:group\_oisf:suricata-7.0
- nothing provides librte\_eal.so.25(DPDK\_25)(64bit) needed by suricata-1:7.0.10-2.el9.x86\_64 from copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:group\_oisf:suricata-7.0
- nothing provides librte\_ethdev.so.25()(64bit) needed by suricata-1:7.0.10-2.el9.x86\_64 from copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:group\_oisf:suricata-7.0
- nothing provides librte\_ethdev.so.25(DPDK\_25)(64bit) needed by suricata-1:7.0.10-2.el9.x86\_64 from copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:group\_oisf:suricata-7.0
- nothing provides librte\_log.so.25()(64bit) needed by suricata-1:7.0.10-2.el9.x86\_64 from copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:group\_oisf:suricata-7.0
- nothing provides librte\_log.so.25(DPDK\_25)(64bit) needed by suricata-1:7.0.10-2.el9.x86\_64 from copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:group\_oisf:suricata-7.0
- nothing provides librte\_mbuf.so.25()(64bit) needed by suricata-1:7.0.10-2.el9.x86\_64 from copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:group\_oisf:suricata-7.0
- nothing provides librte\_mbuf.so.25(DPDK\_25)(64bit) needed by suricata-1:7.0.10-2.el9.x86\_64 from copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:group\_oisf:suricata-7.0
- nothing provides librte\_mempool.so.25()(64bit) needed by suricata-1:7.0.10-2.el9.x86\_64 from copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:group\_oisf:suricata-7.0
- nothing provides librte\_mempool.so.25(DPDK\_25)(64bit) needed by suricata-1:7.0.10-2.el9.x86\_64 from copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:group\_oisf:suricata-7.0  
(try to add ‘–skip-broken’ to skip uninstallable packages or ‘–nobest’ to use not only best candidate packages)  
[root@home luca]#

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ish](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex030/user_avatar/forum.suricata.io/ish/32/8_2.png) [@ish](https://forum.suricata.io/u/ish)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2025, 6:17pm UTC](https://forum.suricata.io/t/error-updating-on-alma-9/5684/2 "2025-05-13T18:17:54Z")

</div>

RHEL was just released today. The packages that were on COPR now fail to install. I did push a rebuild this morning, but not all the infrastructure appears to have caught up. I believe this is a problem for many packages after a new RHEL drops that can last a couple days, but still investigating.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Luca\_vb](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex030/user_avatar/forum.suricata.io/luca_vb/32/3578_2.png) [@Luca\_vb](https://forum.suricata.io/u/Luca_vb)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2025, 6:41pm UTC](https://forum.suricata.io/t/error-updating-on-alma-9/5684/3 "2025-05-13T18:41:22Z")

</div>

Thanks, I guess I will just wait and try again 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Luca\_vb](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex030/user_avatar/forum.suricata.io/luca_vb/32/3578_2.png) [@Luca\_vb](https://forum.suricata.io/u/Luca_vb)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2025, 8:31pm UTC](https://forum.suricata.io/t/error-updating-on-alma-9/5684/4 "2025-05-15T20:31:27Z")

</div>

Any news? Copr lists the builds as failed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ish](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex030/user_avatar/forum.suricata.io/ish/32/8_2.png) [@ish](https://forum.suricata.io/u/ish)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2025, 1:13am UTC](https://forum.suricata.io/t/error-updating-on-alma-9/5684/5 "2025-05-16T01:13:40Z")

</div>

Thats the Fedora 42 build that is failing due to a path issue (fix in progress).

For Alma 9 (and Rocky, Oracle, etc) we’ll just have to wait for them to update to 9.6 as the COPR builds target RHEL/EPEL 9.
