Error updating on Alma 9

1

Hello,

Dnf update gives me these errors, would appreciate some guidance on how to fix:

Error:
Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package suricata-1:7.0.10-1.el9.x86_64

  • nothing provides librte_eal.so.25()(64bit) needed by suricata-1:7.0.10-2.el9.x86_64 from copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:group_oisf:suricata-7.0
  • nothing provides librte_eal.so.25(DPDK_25)(64bit) needed by suricata-1:7.0.10-2.el9.x86_64 from copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:group_oisf:suricata-7.0
  • nothing provides librte_ethdev.so.25()(64bit) needed by suricata-1:7.0.10-2.el9.x86_64 from copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:group_oisf:suricata-7.0
  • nothing provides librte_ethdev.so.25(DPDK_25)(64bit) needed by suricata-1:7.0.10-2.el9.x86_64 from copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:group_oisf:suricata-7.0
  • nothing provides librte_log.so.25()(64bit) needed by suricata-1:7.0.10-2.el9.x86_64 from copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:group_oisf:suricata-7.0
  • nothing provides librte_log.so.25(DPDK_25)(64bit) needed by suricata-1:7.0.10-2.el9.x86_64 from copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:group_oisf:suricata-7.0
  • nothing provides librte_mbuf.so.25()(64bit) needed by suricata-1:7.0.10-2.el9.x86_64 from copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:group_oisf:suricata-7.0
  • nothing provides librte_mbuf.so.25(DPDK_25)(64bit) needed by suricata-1:7.0.10-2.el9.x86_64 from copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:group_oisf:suricata-7.0
  • nothing provides librte_mempool.so.25()(64bit) needed by suricata-1:7.0.10-2.el9.x86_64 from copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:group_oisf:suricata-7.0
  • nothing provides librte_mempool.so.25(DPDK_25)(64bit) needed by suricata-1:7.0.10-2.el9.x86_64 from copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:group_oisf:suricata-7.0
    (try to add ‘–skip-broken’ to skip uninstallable packages or ‘–nobest’ to use not only best candidate packages)
    [root@home luca]#
2

RHEL was just released today. The packages that were on COPR now fail to install. I did push a rebuild this morning, but not all the infrastructure appears to have caught up. I believe this is a problem for many packages after a new RHEL drops that can last a couple days, but still investigating.

3

Thanks, I guess I will just wait and try again :slightly_smiling_face:

4

Any news? Copr lists the builds as failed.

5

Thats the Fedora 42 build that is failing due to a path issue (fix in progress).

For Alma 9 (and Rocky, Oracle, etc) we’ll just have to wait for them to update to 9.6 as the COPR builds target RHEL/EPEL 9.